"2001 Maniacs": Setting Back Southern Relations...in an Ideal Way
Since Roger Ebert is not on television anymore, so the only film expert (in 2010) I consistently follow is Chris Gore. He is Ebert-like in ways when it comes to inexplicable taste. How Ebert applauded the "Lara Croft" films, Gore is willing to show respect to the obscene.
Nothing wrong with the obscene, but it places you in the niche critic genre. As long as the Criterion Collection exists, your expert title may be inappropriate if you are recommending "Suicide Girls Must Die (which I did follow up on and was not disappointed.)." With that title, I wonder who is the real expert is, Gore or I.
But, when you are trying to find one hundred DVD rentals to critique (This review's draft was written in 2010.), you need some guidance. With a recommendation of the 2010 release "2001 Maniacs: Field of Screams", surely the prior film had to be worthwhile enough to warrant a sequel. Let us hope that sequel was not director Tim Sullivan's "Evil Dead 2" (A remake of the original meant to surpass it).
Tecumseh Sherman's devastation of the South have left generations of bitterness toward all Yankees. In Georgia, the town of Pleasant Valley seems to be the only folk who tolerate and even celebrate Northerners. So when eight spring breakers end up taking a detour into this town, they cannot resist the near royal treatment. They are to be the guests of honor at the Guts and Glory Festival. The townsfolk insist that stay till the barbecue finale, but one-by-one, the kids go missing, leaving them to wonder what their role truly is.
"2001 Maniacs" is a simple slasher with a decent sense of humor, but may have had too much budget for its own good. It would have had a little more charm as a z-budget feature, but with Robert Englund's Freddy Krueger obligations being done, I can see the wisdom in paying him the extra dough for name recognition.
There are some murders that require the extra finances, but this is not suppose to be a "great" film. I would have loved cheap effects and regular people (amateur actors) carrying this script. The script is something the viewer cannot claim to be high brow. Its pacing has some hiccups, but it is smart enough on how to make a generic story worthwhile, and makes sure every decadent thing needed for a gore-based comedy is present.
It is also encouraging that the film pulls no punches on the Southern stereotypes. The gore is great, but what may be truly offensive is how far they go in bad mouthing red necks. Fortunately, this film is clever enough to effectively use it as story elements.
These notes were originally written 11 years ago, so I had not seen "Tucker and Dale vs Evil". With that said, I did see the obnoxious "2001 Maniacs: Field of Screams", so maybe my conclusion is still valid.
Finding
a smart horror movie about rednecks can be a task, but "2001 Maniacs"
fits that bill. This low-budget feature maybe a bit too glossy for its
own good, but its spirit remains intact. It is a gem for an insensitive,
liberal gore hound.
No comments:
Post a Comment